Obsessed with The Sopranos
Oct 12, 2007
BY SARITA SARVATE
Ok. I will fess up to the truth. I have been watching The Sopranos.
Ironically, the show hardly entered my consciousness during its run because I refused to pay for HBO and because I do not watch crime dramas. But when, at its conclusion, The New Yorker dubbed The Sopranos â€œthe richest achievement in the history of television,â€ I got hooked on its DVDs.
I was a young girl living in India when I attempted to read Mario Puzoâ€™s Godfather. Yet, something about the book left an impression. Perhaps it was the suspense, the anticipation of terror and death, the dark side of human nature displayed in all its glory.
Eventually I saw the movie on American television. And twenty-five years later, crossing the New Jersey turnpike last April, I recalled the scene of Sonnyâ€™s assassination vividly.
While The Godfather is dark and bloody and almost too serious to be true, The Sopranos, with its humorous yet twisted characters and witty dialogue, rings authentic. A cinematic masterpiece, Sopranos weaves together all of the ingredients of todayâ€™s society in a complicated tapestry of Americana. There is greed, ambition, power play, business strategy, corruption, and the resulting tragedies in all their glory. And, most importantly, there are women who have no power whatsoever.
Which brings me to the inner conflict Iâ€™ve been having with television's â€œrichest achievement.â€ The Sopranos is so misogynistic that I wonder how the producers managed to get accolades year after year without a peep from feminists.
There is Tonyâ€™s wife, Carmela, who has been hailed as a great mother and wife, but whom I find the most dislikable of all. She has the power to change things but wonâ€™t. Instead, whenever Tony brings her a designer cocktail dress, a fur coat, or a stunning piece of jewelry, she routinely obliges him with sex in return, choosing to ignore the blood that has literally been shed to acquire her accoutrements. And she conveniently turns a blind eye to the series of â€œgoomahsâ€ â€”mistressesâ€”and prostitutes with whom he dallies.
Then there is Tonyâ€™s sister, who wants to replace Tony with her boyfriend as the boss of the â€œfamilyâ€ and eventually ends up killing her fiancÃ© in a domestic dispute.
There are also the goomahs: clingy, needy, unbalanced women who look up to Tony as if he were God leading them on a path to salvation.
There are the dancers in the strip club, too, who satisfy the gangstersâ€™ every whim, even pine for relationships with them, and eventually pay a heavy price; some even die in the bargain.
And then there is the psychiatrist, Dr. Melfi, who, week after week, inculcates in Tony the idea that the women in his life, starting with his mother, are the cause of his evil deeds. Freud initiated the cult of â€œmother blame,â€ but The Sopranos carries the clichÃ© to such extremes that one begins to wonder if the showâ€™s satirical intent is to make us all aware of the traps its female characters create for themselves.
It is this very satire that makes me watch tape after tape, I suppose. As Tony blames an Indian restaurantâ€™s chicken vindaloo for his food poisoning, I cringe from the edge of my sofa, only to realize that creator David Chase is trying to expose the intrinsic racism of America.
The most interesting segments of the show happen when Tony struggles with his business strategy, quoting Machiavelliâ€™s Prince and Sun Tzuâ€™s Art of War. â€œIt is better to be feared than to be liked,â€ he says in one scene. In another episode, Uncle Junior advises him, â€œYou steer the ship the best way you know how. Sometimes, you are smooth-sailing; other times, you hit into rocks.â€ I find their words reassuring because I, too, have to make daily decisions in my job about whether to metaphorically â€œclip someoneâ€ or to work with them.
People watch the show because they relate to the Greek tragedy unfolding in front of their eyes. There is friendship, love, need, transference, insecurity, and sheer stupidity. There are people who are stuck in a certain lifestyle because they donâ€™t know anything else. And then there is the suspense, as you wait to find out who will get â€œwhackedâ€ next. But there is something more at work here. My guess is that The Sopranos has been so popular because audiences have found in the show a metaphor for the greed, the backstabbing, and the immorality of American society today.
I, like many film lovers, find the show to be nearly the best thing ever recorded on film. The writing is funny, minimal, punchy, and colloquial, all at the same time. The acting of the main characters has been called Shakespearean. But most of all, it is hard to recall another TV show in which every frame has been lyrically composed, and every season moves along a smooth arc of tension and suspense and resolves itself in such a surrealistic crescendo of revelation, betrayal, and tragedy that one is left breathless. There are no patched-up happy endings here, no formulaic, Hollywood or Bollywood storylines, no celluloid pseudo-reality. Instead, each season reveals a deeper stratum of human nature, so dark and yet so true that one is forced to ponder lifeâ€™s eternal questions one more time.